That operation will always require a disk read, which is rather expensive, especially for larger tables. For example, for a 500MB table in my test, it takes 0.23 seconds just for this query. I thought the table schema should not depend on its size. Guess there is something more technical than my basic understanding.

Comments (0)

› No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Allowed Tags - You may use these HTML tags and attributes in your comment.

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Pingbacks (0)

› No pingbacks yet.